9-11 - THE "IMPOSSIBLE" ATTACK
Part 4
NAVIGATION PANEL : Afghanistan
TO: PART 1
The WTC AttackTO: PART 2
The PENTAGON AttackTO: PART 3
Flight 93 - The Pennsylvania Crash
THOSE PHONE CALLS
Look just to the phone call of Barbara Olson, wife of the Solicitor General. A few days after the event, he violates what had to be "national security" and blabs to CNN that his wife called him collect on an aircraft cell phone to provide details of the hijacking.COLLECT?? The "Airphone" system requires a credit card. Yet, we're to believe that she reversed charges! Whatever becomes of the associated debate, the assertion is ludicrous yet, what did the world read in the news?
Aircraft are designed as a "Faraday Cage." Electronic signals are not supposed to be able to get in or out, at least not easily. The windows are the gaps in that "cage." The aircraft floor contains too much metal. Add altitude/distance - if one had a cell phone in a window. In theory, the Cell towers have a range of approximately two miles; equating to approximately 10,000 feet. Below that altitude, reception is possible, subject to the obvious variables. Add speed; the tower switching complexity would be phenomenal for a hand-held cell phone. Clear communication from a cruise altitude well above 20,000 feet?
[FROM ANOTHER SOURCE: It is currently impossible to connect by cell phone in a plane that is above 4,000 feet. So, scientifically and technologically, the cell phone calls of 9-11 were impossible. There were definitely some calls made from airphones, and probably from the WTC planes, which were low enough to connect with a tower for a few minutes before impact. But some of the calls that were reportedly made that day are simply impossible, especially aboard Flight 93. - From: gatorpress.com/badsam/page5.html ]
Propaganda? PSYOPS? "Perception Control?" Whatever the label - it worked!
AND, nobody in an "official" capacity has yet asked any questions - not even the conventional media.
ANOTHER QUESTION - For the sake of argument, if there were no aircraft at the Pentagon & Pennsylvania sites, why were the other two aircraft hijacked in the first place? Remember that the best evidence of any al Qaeda involvement in 9-11 is the phony videotape of the "fat" Osama. Think about it: discounting the phony videotape and the passionate "plausible assertions," no one took credit for 9-11. Factually, Osama bin Laden DENIED involvement.
So, again, what is the "deal" with the second pair of aircraft?
Answer: One must speculate that they were backups in case anything got screwed up with the first two.
Think about it: The aircraft strikes had to take place in order for the WTC controlled demolition to be "sold" as terrorism. If the first two aircraft were successful, there was a disposal problem, with the last two. But, from the Pentagon & Pennsylvania "crash" staging, we know there was an incredibly involved "Plan B."
Yet, there is another "clue" in front of us: "Why didn't the second pair of aircraft "second" the strike of the first two - or find a secondary target - for a bigger terror statement?" Clearly - and strangely - there was a limited mission, with a prominent element of "conscience." Terrorists with a "conscience"? interesting! No, "revealing!"
Think of the unusually jubilant Israeli "art students" film crew. They were released as Mossad and friends. The Mossad just happened to be in town to film 9-11! "Friendly spies" or not, nothing has been said about their photography. Very unusual oversight for an event so thoroughly investigated.
No factual radar track can be shown of the second two aircraft. For that matter, there is zero radar data on any of the flights - just the emulation imagery. Where did that emulation imagery originate from? The D.C. area is smothered in defense radar. No radar data?? Ridiculous!
THE PRESIDENT
Return to Booker Elementary School. Andrew Card whispers in the ear of America's President "There's been a second strike on the World Trade Center; America is under Attack." Great PR! What a fabulous choice of words at a time like that!
Imagine that no further details were provided to the President! Likewise, there was no demand for details, from him. There was no reaction from the leader of the free world. Instead, the President sits there listening to a children's story about a goat! Ten minutes or thirty minutes... it makes no difference. Either Bush knew in advance or he was resigned to the fact that "other people" would run things for him as they probably always have.
We're to believe that the Vice President was forcibly moved to a safe location, but the President was allowed to listen to a goat story?
Presumably, in that time frame, there could be no known end to the "attack" by the staff. Yet, they just let Bush sit there. That was the worst possible PR! Eliminating the impossible, one must conclude that the "attack" limits were, in fact, known. The entire staff couldn't have been so incompetent as to remain calm in the face of two terrorist strikes on the World Trade Center NOT if they were not certain that more attacks were not on the way - somewhere. The President's location was public information. At least two "alleged" aircraft were still off course & presumed to be hijacked yet they let the President just sit there. Just Absurd!
No reasonable person can believe that Andy Card said anything more prominent than "We need to leave in 20 minutes." But, WHY?
Yet, that's exactly what happened!
Certainly the Booker Elementary video will join the "Zapruder Film (Kennedy assassination)" in history.
Bush's later claims about having witnessed the aircraft strike on TV don't hold up. His statements are more reflective of a serious mental problem.
Specifically, at a public appearance, Bush gave the following response to a 7th grader
"Thank you, Jordan. Well, Jordan, you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my Chief of Staff, Andy Card -- actually, I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident.
But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it. And I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my Chief of Staff, who is sitting over here, walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower, America is under attack."
TO TOP
THE SECOND STATEMENT:
"Anyway, I was sitting there, and my Chief of Staff -- well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane, or -- anyway, I'm sitting there, listening to the briefing, and Andy Card came and said, "America is under attack."
( http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020105-3.html )
For starters, just note the verbal chaos in Bush's descriptions (plural) of events - clearly poorly constructed lies.
1. The Booker Elementary teacher said there was no TV present.
2. The first attack was known before Bush entered the school.
3. Remembering that the second strike was described to Bush in the classroom, he is implying he saw the first aircraft hit the WTC - impossible, of course.
4. The video coverage showed clear weather. No pilot is going to have such an 'accident' in clear weather. As a pilot himself, Bush should have recognized that.
5. Given the 1993 bombing of the WTC, it would be natural to assume more terrorism not an "accident."
6. He wasn't "whisked" anywhere.
So, at Booker Elementary, with America "under attack," his staff was content to just wait to take the President to Air Force One; thereafter flying him all over the country incommunicado, for all practical purposes. BUT, we're told, the hijackers were believed to have both the digital codes for Air Force One, along with the coded identity of Air Force One. What a frightening state of affairs! Air Force One was a target.
Excuse me ....!
For nearly two weeks after 9-11, the world heard Ari Fleicher repeat the "Psychido" terminology "real," "specific" and of course the standard PSYOPS whopper - "credible!"
[Notice the universal propaganda application of that particular term in everything! Never "verified," "highly reliable" or "documented;" always "CREDIBLE"]
So, logically (!), they took the President straight to Air Force One. No fighters are scrambled to protect Air Force One. Ridiculous!
And yet ..
Would the hijackers warn the White House that they had the codes for Air force One? Killers don't telegraph warnings! Imagine the White House being unable to trace the calls. Just try to imagine the effort it would take to get through to the White House on 9-11 for anything! And that the hijackers did all that on their way to "paradise!" Doesn't add up!
AND, what would any terrorist do with Air Force One's codes? The television stations gave the location of Air Force One; what more could the terrorists need?
Most importantly, would a story like that just disappear? No investigations, reprimands or prosecutions of those in charge of the codes or communication channels. Not even a statement that the "message" was bogus; not even a statement that the chaos of the day causing an over-reaction. Ridiculous!
By the 26th of September, there were a few tongue-in-cheek deflections of the issue; then it just faded into history almost. But, the press was onto a major issue - Why did the President "get out of Dodge??"
Ari tried his best to cover for the President; he failed. Despite the avowed "real" and "specific" threats to Air Force One, Ari said that the threat was transmitted to the President, while he was aboard Air Force One. So, that leaves the President as having skipped town BEFORE the "threat" was received. So, either the President is being portrayed as a coward on the run, or the obvious lies got jammed up, in the obvious "compartmentalization" of the constantly-changing "truth." It can't be both ways.
"Officially," Bush was on his way back to Washington when the codes were discovered to have been compromised. So, Air Force One diverted to Barksdale. A truth-readout is badly needed here. When Bush departed Florida, where did he "officially" go? Apparently, Bush did go directly to Barksdale. And the reason he was high-tailing it to Barksdale, instead of D.C. was....?
Amazingly, it could easily have been described that in the heat of battle, an unpredictable move was chosen. No one would ever have questioned the tactic.
In hindsight, it's clear that there was never any "threat." That leaves the third possibility the most probable that Bush was being kept quiet until the day's events could be analyzed & a plausible set of political assertions could be assembled. Imagine the "system" having the power to "shush" the President! So, there's the rub - who is actually in charge? It couldn't be George W. Bush! The "President" shouldn't be have to be covered by deceptions of that type.
THOSE PESKY HIJACKERS!
(and other matters)SO, what became of those hijackers with the codes? They just disappeared in the mist of 9-11. Nobody went looking for them. All those Saudi names... and nobody went to Saudi Arabia to track their "associates." No one "officially" asked questions or clarified the issue.
We now know that the supposed hijackers were not on any passenger manifests - of four flights. Thus, where did the sudden identification of these monsters come from? When at least seven of the "names" were discovered to be still alive, why didn't the FBI go after the "real" identity of this bunch??
Does anyone remember former FBI Agent, John O'Neil? He was forced out of the FBI in the midst of identifying al Qaeda terrorism and threats to the United States. He was steered into the Security Chief job at the WTC, by another former FBI agent. O'Neil died in the WTC.
Not surprisingly (anymore) there is no record of the FBI securing his personal files, attempting to "make" the al Qaeda connection. WHY?
Unbelievably, after the implausibly "abbreviated" investigation of 9-11 was published, the Saudis' involvement became a "national secret." Looking at what happened to Iraq, why would the White House cover for a more obvious problem area?
TO TOP
Let's look at this -Bush said that he'd ordered a full investigation of 9-11. Quickly, the White House asked for a shallow investigation so as NOT to divert needed funds from the "war on terrorism." So, if there truly was a threat of "terror" and "evil," why wouldn't they WANT answers? If "terrorists" could produce one 9-11, why couldn't they produce another, especially while the U.S. was seemingly damaged? They could only be uninterested in getting these answers if the answers were already known!
Returning to the hijackers, no airline pilot will accept the notion that the alleged hijackers could have hit three precision targets at their "Least-Risk Point" on the first try no matter how intense their "studies" were.
Little-known to the general public is the fact that it's quite a challenge for an experienced airline pilot to descend so as to be in position to readily set up for a landing. Thus, the alleged pilots - famous for their incompetence (according to post-9/11 documentaries) - are going to successfully get three of four jets down so as to hit their intended targets - and at the "least risk point?" That's what the world is expected to believe.
A famous - but tell-tale news video - portrays a secret in plain sight in the second WTC strike. That video screams volumes. In the last seconds, the aircraft is banked by approximately 60 degrees a 2 "G" turn. However, the video sequence shows something incredibly revealing the nose falls, then is pulled upward, compensating for a loss of vertical lift, as the aircraft banked. One may note the resulting upward flex of the wingtips. The 60-degree bank angle also attests to the aircraft being manually flown, as the autopilot limit on its bank-angle control is approximately 30 degrees.
That maneuver is the mark of a skilled jet pilot! The pull on the control column would have been a professional reflex. At that point, who would care that the aircraft would hit in a descent? Only a professional jet pilot with ingrained reflexes! 
The history of 9-11 reveals that the Israelis (Odigo - [an online instant communications company ( www.odigo.org )]) were warned of the imminent attack; Islamic terrorists would never dream of such decency.
[CONFIRMATION: Alex Diamandis, vice president of sales and marketing, confirmed that workers in Odigo's research and development and international sales office in Israel received a warning from another Odigo user approximately two hours prior to the first attack. - The Washington Post, September 28, 2001 - www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/09/WTC_Odigo.html ]
The lack of any single group or country to "pin" it on leaves one to ponder whether international financial interests may have added to the mix of nationalities known or believed to be involved. Yet, no matter how one views the 9-11 events, it's obvious that they required one bodacious intelligence and operations team. Still, only the alleged hijackers are cited as culprits, with a few scattered illegals arrested in the manner of the infamous " usual suspects" tradition.
THE SMOKING GUNS
One of the most curious statements of the 9-11 history is the "slip" of Tom Kenney, the FEMA Urban Search & Rescue worker. According to his statement to Dan Rather, the FEMA team arrived the night before 9-11. Most convenient(!).Certainly, there's some debate as to the arrival date he gave to Dan Rather until you realize that at a minimum, those in the FEMA team would have checked into a hotel on the night of 9-11.
FEMA's Tom Kenney:
"We're currently one of the first teams that was deployed to support the city of New York in this disaster. We arrived late Monday night (Sept. 10) and went right into action on Tuesday morning (Sept. 11)."
That statement was made on Wednesday/Thursday (depending on your source of information) to Dan Rather. Even Thursday would not give credibility to the alleged "error."
It's true that days can be mixed up, but these two days? Mixed up on Wednesday? Granted Kenney is human, but it's just not all that likely that Monday and Tuesday could get confused on his second day on the 9-11 job.
It's also true that Kenney's wife denied the statement; but not Kenney. FEMA also refused the accurate information under the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) law, with the usual "No data responsive to your request." Or, more specifically, from June of 2002, "Liaison with cognizant personnel reveals that no responsive documents exist within the files of the Federal Emergency Management Agency relative to your request." In other words, there was no electronic search, even under a mistaken name. The FOIA request was "conveniently" submitted under the name of "Kennedy," not the correct name, "Kenney." Garbage-in; Garbage-out!
As to any rational measure of government accountability, given the obvious and typical burial of facts involved in 9-11, there is little chance that "hard" facts can be tracked down without certified pictures of the day of 9-11. In all likelihood, the FEMA Search & Rescue team would be found setting up camp on 9-11.
HERE'S THE KICKER!
[Text accompanying this photo:]
Boston, MA, October 31, 2001 - -
Members of the Massachusetts Urban Search and Rescue Task Force are pictured with Paul Pierce and Jason Kidd of the Boston Celtics. The all-volunteer Task Force was the first search and rescue team to arrive at Ground Zero in New York City on September 11th. For a full week, the 62 members worked 12-hour shifts digging through the rubble in search of survivors. Members and their families were in attendance that evening. Representing the Task Force are Brad Stocks (Londonderry, NH fire dept.); Anita Arnum (Acton Fire Dept.); Mark Foster, Team Leader (Emergency Management Director for Beverly, MA); Steve Clendenin (Framingham Fire Dept.); and Glynn Montgomery (Malden Fire Dept.)."Photo courtesy of the NBA and Boston Celtics."
In the caption - "The all-volunteer Task Force was the first team at Ground Zero in New York City on September 11th.
TO TOP
Remember Kenney's statement as to his own team - "....one of the first..."Can ANY reasonable person doubt that kind of detailed corroboration??
FEMA has had three years to straighten out this matter. What are the facts, as God knows them?
THEN RUDY SAID IT!
In the 9-11 hearings on May 18 & 19, 2004; Rudy Guiliani spoke to a FEMA "exercise" force which was in place on 9-11, addressing the location as "Pier 92." The exercise was called "Tripod." That having been said, it's bizarre that FEMA would be less than candid about the matter. They denied the Kenney statement, but failed to elaborate on the now publicly-known facts. That's not the kind of response you'd expect from a responsible agency discussing an emergency like 9-11.
Had FEMA been promptly forthcoming, "coincidence" might be considered a reasonable explanation. Instead they appeared to be covering details that they wished to remain out of public view.
Anyone who paid attention to the FEMA report on the Oklahoma City bombing will find it hard to trust anything FEMA has anything to do with. In that case, the FEMA report was predicated on a 28-foot crater - when the reality was 18 feet - which technically ruled-out the truck-bomb as the source of the damage.
Also, just a quick look at "official accountability" on the matter of the 1993 WTC bombing: The FBI's awareness of the situation is called into question by their use of an Egyptian informant, Emad Salem. The following links have the mainstream news articles regarding this:
The information can be found: HERE: www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/wtcbomb.html
[ "HOME PAGE" for above site ]
- and also HERE. There is too little which can be trusted.
And, then A most suspicious detail: The favoritism shown to the American side of the bin Laden family. In 1999, one of the brothers was identified by the CIA to Congress as facilitating the finances of al Qaeda, on Cyprus. Multiple international political battles were fought over that issue. In January of 2001, the White House killed an investigation into the bin Laden family funding of al Qaeda. In May of 2001, family members successfully received Swiss citizenship.
Immediately after 9-11, the bin Laden members were assembled and evacuated via private aircraft destination unknown. The FBI did the "exit interview." The evacuation flight supposedly left from Boston - the airport originating the first WTC aircraft strike. It must not be forgotten that Osama bin Laden and the Taliban were originally utilized and funded by U.S. agencies; as was Saddam Hussein, and Manuel Noriega and (back when they were seen as a hedge against Soviet communism) .
Consider the fact that the bin Laden family was assembled and evacuated by private aircraft BEFORE private aircraft could legally fly. Medevac flights were grounded, but the bin Laden's could fly.
In a nutshell -
1. The 9-11 warnings were known since at least 1995.
2. The known Kamikaze plan was demonstrated to be serious by the hijacking of Air France Flight 8969. The hijackers attempted to commandeer an Air France A-300, then fill it with fuel for a target in Paris. The details of the hijacker intentions were suppressed from the public - and the airline pilots. That event "conveniently" failed to turn up in the official 9-11 Report. The most suspicious piece of evidence that the Kamikaze attacks were known - AND DEMONSTRATED - to be in the works; and it didn't receive any mention.
3. The airline pilots were NOT told - until after the Filipinos blew the lid off "Project Bojinka" - that the US agencies very well knew of the seriousness of the Kamikaze plans. THAT revelation, from the Philippines, after key U.S. personalities passionately tried to claim "no warnings." Amazingly, it was one of the warnings which was known and factually "credible" for a change - cemented, in no uncertain terms, by the foiled Air France Flight 8969 hijacking.
4. Professionals within the appropriate government agencies were hammered for trying to illuminate what became 9-11. The investigators-turned-whistle-blowers continue to be hammered; after 9-11. They should have become major resources for "what went wrong."
5. The White House blocked an investigation into the bin Laden family funding of al Qaeda in January of 2001.
6. With that "killed" investigation in the immediate background, if the bin Laden family could be evacuated - by private aircraft - immediately after 9-11, the "bureaucratic fog" claim is a blatant farce.
It is staggering to contemplate the magnitude of coordination it would take to evacuate the "bin Laden" family at that time - with that name on the tongue of every American. By any reasonable expectation IMPOSSIBLE!
Yet, it happened!
Later, the bin Ladens' were allowed to withdraw their investment & profits, when they were discovered to be part of the "Carlyle Group" investments, of the Elder Bush fame. There was no self-reporting by the Carlyle Group. Similarly, nothing is said about the association of the bin Ladens' ongoing business relationship with the Bechtel Corporation and their "preferential" profiteering.
CONSTITUTION THE
The outcome of 9-11 is that America is far more threatened from ambitious people in government than from forces outside our borders.We want to preserve the U. S. Constitution, for this is what makes America worth fighting for in the first place. Too much paranoia has allowed people to accept "dictator-like" bans on a citizen's freedom (while INCREASING the flow of illegal immigration simultaneously & paradoxically).
The U.S. Constitution is what makes America "America" - using this attack as an excuse to remove all power from the U.S. citizen will make this country just another gray, socialist semi-slave camp. If that document is abandoned, traditional America goes with it. Freedom and justice has been defined by the entire world essentially by the U.S. Constitution. What America HAD, the world wants. If the Constitution is relegated to the status of a political relic, the entire world faces the sunset of justice and freedom.
And now, U.S. agencies can transport people around the world to mete out Gestapo-like justice in secret trials. This is the provision in the "Patriot Act" legislation which allows citizens to be tried in "tribunals" that are sealed off from their families and friends - everyone. It was even proposed by the current President, exclusively naming him - personally; not his office - as the ultimate authority in the post 9-11 Presidential Military Order on terrorist tribunals.
CONSTITUTION IS SUFFICIENT TO FIGHT "TERROR"
The Constitution has the power to have prevented the 9-11 attack. The necessary investigation powers were in place before 9-11. But the "whistle blowers" got the shaft. Those who insist that Constitutional Law needs to be suspended in order to fight terrorism have some unspoken desire up their sleeves: For the post- 9-11 Patriot Act laws only pose harm to U.S. citizens: these laws give the government sole discretion as to who's a "terrorist" - and once so declared, that citizen is denied the ability to prove himself innocent: sealed off from everyone he knows, from lawyers, written correspondence, etc. His life is in slave-like control of the government-appointed tribunal and no one even may know about his situation. If the public can be frightened into becoming stupid enough to believe that citizens need to become slaves to the government, while immigrants can pour across our borders, - and that this will prevent immigrants from committing terrorism - then American freedom is truly lost.The "Patriot Act" was totally unnecessary: its only "advantage" is that enables government agencies to establish tyranny over citizens.
TO TOP
This is why many people suspect that "9-11" may have come from within. In order to preserve the American way of life, one must look very closely at the events of 9-11. The missing information is more compelling than what has been issued as the "truth." If those actually responsible are not brought to light, America is in dire straits.Immediately America suffered the trashing of the American Constitution under such legislation as the "Patriot Act" and the "Homeland Security Act."
Clearly the Constitution was powerful enough to block the events of 9-11, even if they had been externally perpetrated exclusively. The Constitution can dissuade and punish treason.
IT GOT WORSE!
Somehow the entire set of events of 9-11 were just too much for the American public. They didn't notice that INSTANTLY, legislation was on the floor of Congress converting the U.S. Government into an ex post facto insurance company. YES! All of that was done in nearly an instant with no objections from the White House. Twenty billion dollars, just thrown at 9-11; just for starters! In contrast, think of the screaming and hollering associated with a request for just one billion dollars returned not added, but returned - to the oft-raped and failing Social Security fund!
Then, there was the psychological effect of America's "Reichstag Fire:" Hundreds of millions of dollars were raped by the top charities, as Americans were led to believe that tens of thousands died at the World Trade Center. Only a single man took that issue seriously: Bill O'Reilly, Fox TV. His issue was just the internal diversion of charity money.
If the figures were never corrected, these mainstream "approved" charities would have "cleaned house" by prostituting 9-11!
Americans didn't notice what was actually happening to them. The events were that overpowering. 2,800 people died at the World Trade Center. But for several months, the count was "estimated" as over ten thousand despite demands for factual statistics. The real numbers were kept quiet. WHY?
In the "convenient" delay, the charity money came pouring in to already rich charities. America was spellbound by the fear generated by 9-11.
America now converted into an insurance company - would pay for the damage to the WTC, certainly the Pentagon. The airlines legally responsible for airport security were held harmless. If family members of the 9-11 victims would release the airlines from liability, they could have anywhere from $750,000 to 1.6 million dollars out of the tax coffers.
Adding insult to injury, the airlines ADDITIONALLY reaped billions in rewards - in the form of grants, loans and tax-breaks. Of all the industries that suffered from 9-11, only the airlines received such treatment!It happened! And it happened so very quickly. It should be noted that three major airlines were headquartered in Texas.
America watched a videotape of "Osama bin Laden," who had gained approximately 70 pounds in the "low quality" videotape -
- announcing his involvement in 9-11. The facial features were far off. Yet many bought into the obvious farce. 
The Viet Nam War began by the scammed "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution." Beyond the dollar cost, we lost 58,000 kids with many times that number wounded. The cost to America was tremendous, but somehow, Americans forget what "unexplained" reports can do to the nation.
Wars have sometimes been manufactured for unclear reasons. I say "unclear" only because the wars did not result in victory - even though victory was within our power to achieve. AND they resulted in profits to industry, benefits to agencies interested in "field testing" military equipment... and, what else? The veterans try to sort out the meaning of the combat they endured; and the general public is given a false image of America failing at war. Why would our leaders be interested in reducing America's power and self-confidence?
The "fear-hope" mechanism (carrot and stick) of manufactured wars demonstrated the "Mind Control" aspect of the operation: Imagine the American public accepting such obvious deception as the feigned "retreat" of Vietnam (for example) without screaming bloody murder? Somehow the majority of the public doesn't catch on: In a most devious way The Deception Works!
BUT HOW COULD THIS HAVE HAPPENED?
It's an ugly subject: but if one dives into the history of Hitler's Nazism, many things are revealed.
Hitler's gang proved that it was just a matter of "Perception Control" and "Emotional Control" of the public. The modern version is more highly developed, but it all comes straight from Mein Kampf! To paraphrase, "If the terrorist didn't exist, we'd need to invent him."
The CIA's MKULTRA project "screamed" too loudly to remain a secret forever. That was a "drug treatment" program designed to induce "Manchurian Candidate"-like results. Yes, this is "speculation," but many suspect such "mystery" operatives were mobilized in this way - to be the "patsy" for crimes that "coincidentally" resulted in major political changes. Names like Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, Sirhan Sirhan and possibly Timothy McVeigh come to mind. The best guess is that the program starts with a chemical "shock treatment" of LSD-type drugs, intense briefings, hypnosis and an amphetamine control treatment. Engineering the "fall-guy" in this way would allow for the necessary "Plausible Assertion / Denial" required to slip it passed public scrutiny.
Between the British intelligence groups & the OSS/CIA, the successful components of Nazism's control of the public were in the media (propaganda) dictating perceptions, coupled with extreme emotionalism (to "disable" the audience's intellect). Revenge & fear on one end - with "hope" on the other. That emotional hypnosis got the German population moving exactly where the government wanted to take them.
The 1920s Germans were desperate from the financial, social and political effects of World War One; fear was the norm. Hitler claimed the ability to provide hope. All the Nazi leadership had to do was to press the START button, then harness the "energy" from a state of randomness/chaos into a political "laser." Thus, we see the "lessons-learned."
EMOTIONAL CONTROL = MIND CONTROL
(FEAR & REVENGE vs. HOPE)
The Germans got the Reichstag Fire, America got the "Gulf of Tonkin" incident; now 9-11.Today, we're witnessing that same process. The "Empowering Acts" (Patriot Act, Homeland Security Act, etc.) were born from fear & revenge - against "terror" and "evil." But, those directly reflect Hitler's remarks in Mein Kampf: "If the [terrorist] didn't exist, we'd have to invent him." From the unconstitutional politics that followed, it is not far-fetched to suspect "PSYOPS" were employed in the 9-11 attack.
TO TOP
In the legacy of the rise of Hitler's Nazism, fear and revenge had churned up an American blood-lust. That blood-lust was aroused by the media in the guise of "patriotism," as done in the Nazi machine's propaganda.
Then, there was the business of trashing the U.S. Constitution
The so-called "Patriot Act" and "Homeland Security Act" were scammed into law while emotions ran high - so Americans wouldn't notice. It thrust billions of tax dollars into "connected pockets," and America became a police state - with "optional tyranny."So, where does that leave America? In examining the TECHNICAL facts of the attack, and the POLITICAL realities of its aftermath: were the events of 9-11 a terrorist operation? The results tell the story: The American Constitution is almost dead - at the hands of those who took an oath to uphold that document, against all foreign and domestic enemies. The traditional American way of life is equally endangered. ALL FROM WITHIN. The results of 9-11 were clearly delivered with a methodology and a vengeance.
One SITE has assembled a long list of anomalies challenging anyone's ability to accept the "official" account of 9-11. That challenge is expanded by what WASN'T told about 9-11. The presentation of 310 "What are the odds of..." questions make an interesting summary.Of all the political documents in history, none has contributed as much to civilization as much as the U.S. Constitution. Its preservation is a global mandate! Yet the danger clearly has not passed.
The cold-blooded motivation behind 9-11 is most obvious in the field of airport security. Airport security serves to mentally and emotionally condition flying travelers to "Gestapo" shake-down treatment.
9-11 POLITICS
Beyond the citing the impossible mechanical discrepancies, 9-11 also requires a focus on its political fallout. To be fair, one must ask what facts not just clever rhetoric - support the "official" positions on 9-11 and beyond. In a sentence, there aren't enough available pertinent facts to speak of. "National Security" is another way of saying, "We don't want to get caught."All evidence points to a single word - "Power!" The common ambition of all persons competing within an agency (and AGENCIES competing with each other) produces a continuous grasping for more power. It's only natural. That's why we have "checks and balances," to keep this instinct from running roughshod over the Constitutional rights of American citizens.
Those who love the Constitution are startled as we watch its destruction, with a federal police state waiting to replace it.
Given all the 9-11 American death, America has the mandate to demand WHY the White House would cover up facts and avenues of truth behind 9-11. If there had been a true [external] terrorist threat, there would have been a massive effort to expose the details of 9-11. The White House forced the Mexican border wide open, while simultaneously spewing claims of "threats" against the United States. The White House position is nothing less than ludicrous.
The President claimed to have ordered a full investigation into 9-11. Nothing remotely close to a "full investigation" has taken place.
With nothing but a bin Laden videotape of unverifiable authenticity, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan too poor to pose a military challenge to the U.S.
Unfortunately for oil producers, there was not enough Afghan governmental control to ensure the safety of a planned trans-Afghan oil pipeline against violent Afghan tribes. It was apparent that the Caspian Sea oil/gas would otherwise need to be routed to Europe - too expensive to be commercially practical. With Afghanistan taken, the previously tabled trans-Afghan oil/gas pipeline plan was back in action.
Following the Afghan invasion, the re-planting of the Afghan opium fields was almost immediate, with zero opposition from the U.S. forces. Viet Nam veterans instantly recognize the pattern: like the Asian "Golden Triangle." Nevertheless the outcome dovetailed with the petroleum industry's corporate goals.
It was very apparent before the invasion of Iraq that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. Saddam was not an imminent threat to the U.S. When the Iraq invasion was inevitable, the American oil companies actually doubled their oil purchases from Iraq (funding a supposed monster). From the beginning of the focus on Saddam, it was known that Iraq had no genuine link to 9-11. Even now it's no secret that Iraq was not supporting Al Qaeda (a CIA "left-over" from the '80's). Saddam another U.S. made monster - killed far fewer Iraqi people than the war did.
Bush's immediate issuance of Presidential Executive Order 13303 (later - E.O. 13315) made it clear that oil was the goal of the 2003 Iraq invasion and occupation. The single Order made Iraq an American corporate colony.
[Executive Order 13303 decrees that "any attachment, judgment, decree, lien, execution, garnishment, or other judicial process is prohibited, and shall be deemed null and void," with respect to the Development Fund for Iraq and "all Iraqi petroleum and petroleum products, and interests therein." In other words, if ExxonMobil or ChevronTexaco touch Iraqi oil, it will be immune from legal proceedings in the United States.]The post 9-11 case against Saddam was Tyranny, Mass Murder, Torture Chambers and seemingly lawless authority. In the end, those became the U.S. modus operandi. In the end, it would seem that the underlying issue was that Iraqi oil didn't have adequate U.S. corporate control!
And yet: Notice the price of Gasoline lately? Despite access to these oil reserves, it strangely has no effect on the prices America has been paying. Nor has Bush said a word about the radical prices.
The only nuclear weapons to be found in Iraq are the tons of toxic (poisonous - not highly radioactive) depleted uranium munitions fired on the Iraqi people soldiers and civilians.
The Gitmo prison camp - Guantanamo - (built by Cheney's old company) is a miniaturized concentration camp doing psychological experiments on human beings.
It seems that the U.S. "psyops" guys blew it; Iraq didn't embrace democracy, freedom or America. They're a different "world" where Western values, logic and attitudes just don't register. The result: a "swamp" of confusion - for Iraqis, the U.S., and the world.
Bush's almost immediate "Presidential Executive Order 13303" 22 May, 2003 - declared control of the Iraqi oil to be the province of the United States. Again, after "granting" Iraq their sovereignty, Executive Order 13315 emphasized the colonization status of Iraq.
Listening to Bush speak without a prepared statement invites instant and serious questions as to his basic mental capacities. He typically doesn't answer impromptu questions, he typically rambles in the general vicinity of the topic. He's famous for making ludicrous statements which make many wonder whether or not the statements are Freudian slips, forecasting that we will lose in Iraq and that his administration is always thinking of new ways to harm America (said at the signing of the 2004 Defense Spending Bill 5 Aug. 2004). His attention span appears to be approximately five seconds long.
Blair's infamous Iraq dossier turned out to be fake, plagiarized from a student's thesis in the USA. More of the same is regularly exposed in England.
TO TOP
Those "mobile biological weapons trailers" turned out to be another fake; actually discovered to be hydrogen balloon inflation units sold by the British to Saddam. The list just rambles on and on and on. The deception is abounding and continuing.The magnitude of the White House lies has placed the American people among the worlds' victims of history's greatest and most deadly hoax.
Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9-11" film did a great job of confronting most of the infamous and deadly facts behind 9-11. Yet, some prominent issues are missing. The aircraft missing at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania; the military's nonchalance in responding. AND the impossibility of the towers steel structure collapsing on their own footprint - from fire.
Moore didn't address the Iraq oil profiteering. In any case, it seems that the Bush family and the bin Ladens go back a very long way; as Moore aptly illustrated. Osama's brother, Salem, was George Junior's money partner in Abusto Energy; the source of the startup money. Possibly, it was because of that connection that Osama was recruited to play the "holy warrior" for the CIA in the Afghan-USSR battle.
Moore's film, "Fahrenheit 9-11" makes a good presentation on the Bush-Saudi-bin Laden connections, putting such players as James Bath and James Baker into appropriate perspective agents representing the Saudi and bin Laden interests. Moore estimates that the Bush family is in line to receive 1.4 billion dollars from their Saudi deals.
The bin Laden investments in the Carlyle Group of George Bush Sr. fame - are now a legend in their own right. Not until being 'busted' by the media did the bin Ladens get forced into withdrawing their Carlyle money all of it; no questions asked. Bush Jr. obviously made no attempt to seize the assets under his terrorist directive.
Michael Moore seems to have recognized the bogus claims about Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction. He appears to accept that the alleged link of Saddam - Al Qaeda and to 9-11 as a pack of lies.
To look in another direction: Immediately after the 9-11 attacks, the former Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was directly asked what the 9-11 attacks meant for the Israeli-US relations. His quick reply was a Freudian slip: "It's very good. Well, it's not 'good,' but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel." How correct he turned out to be. But, is there more to the picture?
Certainly history owes a certain debt for the victims of the Nazi holocaust. However, common sense dictates that the USA tax coffers should not be the perpetual "apology purse," after the German "Nazi" debt was been terminated. Accordingly, the 1948 State of Israel is not a "Holy Grail." Whether the Israeli sinking of the American ship USS Liberty in 1967, or building the Gaza Wall, Israel is a "grown-up" player in world events, and is responsible for answering for itself without hiding behind the tired excuse of "anti-Semitism" - however unpopular that idea may strike anyone.
"Fahrenheit 9/11" seems to have left out some important information, concerning the events of 9-11. For example, five "dancing art students" were arrested for suspicious behavior, filming, cheering and laughing as the WTC towers burned and collapsed. They turned out to be Mossad, with the usual 'catch-and-release' license. It seems that the Mossad agents were using the "front" of a moving company for their still unspecified operations. Apparently, their 9-11 pictures got lost.
To date, no one has a viable clue as to who actually hijacked the 9-11 aircraft. Two of the aircraft are still missing, with the Pentagon & Shanksville, Pennsylvania sites failing to turn up viable evidence of actual aircraft crashes - versus a limited "salting" of small aircraft parts. The alleged hijackers failed to turn up on any passenger manifests, or in the autopsies. At least seven of the alleged hijacker names turned up alive, with no further questions being asked as to whom the supposed hijackers were.
The FBI Director, Robert Mueller, has admitted that there is no documentary evidence proving that the pandered 9-11 hijackers were actually on the 9-11 aircraft:
[In an April 19 speech delivered to the Common wealth Club in San Francisco, Mueller said that the purported hijackers, in his words, 'left no paper trial.' The FBI director stated flatly:The 9-11 warnings sent to Odigo [Confirmation: www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/09/WTC_Odigo.html ] in New York and Israel before the 9-11 aircraft even left the ground reveals that those with foreknowledge of the attack had an interest in Israeli security. It could not be expected that al Qaeda or Saudi interests would warn Israeli companies."In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot." ]
Google: "FBI: No evidence Linking Hijackers to 9-11"
Ultimately, America's military presence seems to serve as sort of an Israeli proxy-warrior; Americans certainly get nothing from it. At the time of this writing, the body count is approaching fifteen-hundred American soldiers killed in Iraq. For what? For whom?
We are expected to believe that God told Bush to invade Afghanistan and Iraq; and God speaks through Bush. (As Hitler's Nazis said, "Gott mit uns!)
[Confirmation: According to a front page story in the July 1, 2003 issue of "Haaretz", one of Israel's leading newspapers, U. S. President George W. Bush told an Arab meeting on June 24th, that God told him to bomb Iraq and Afghanistan. The President was there to bring pressure on Arab Palestinian leaders to accept his "Road To Peace" program.]Consider the "Patriot Act," the "Homeland Security Act," the Afghan and Iraqi invasions in light of the "Project for a New American Century" (PNAC) and the Hart-Rudman Report. Brezenski's "The Grand Chessboard" lays out the basic Middle-East conquest plan.Google: God told Geo. Bush to attack Iraq
Following WWII, the press vilified the German citizen for "not knowing" about the atrocities the Nazi government was committing. As with the citizens of Nazi Germany, will the conveniently ignorant American public carry the blame and pay - when the rest of the world looks at us with the same hatred? This doesn't need to happen: WE KNOW BETTER.
* * * * * * * *
FOR INDEPENDENT RESEARCH:
PICTURE GALLERY HERE
[The 9-11 pictures are starting to disappear]
TIMELINE HERE
THE STAND-DOWN HERE
General Overview of the Research into the
Events of 9/11 and the War on Freedom.
In addition to the links noted within this article, information was also sourced from the following:
home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/exp.htm
Suspicious 9-11 "Coincidences" - S&P closed at "911.00" on 9/11/02 . . . NY lottery came up 911 on 9/11/02 . . . UAL "put options" 90 times higher between 9/6/01 & 9/10/01 . . .
TO TOP